Friday, 15 February 2019

Corylus avellana - a typical species of family Betulaceae


The name for each higher group in the classification of plants up to the order level is derived from one of the genera it contains.  This genus is termed the type genus.  Corylus and a few related genera used to be classified in family Corylaceae but have now been transferred to Betulaceae as subfamily Coryloideae.  Corylus avellana (hazel) was first named as such by Linnaeus in 1753.  Corylus is the classical Latin name for the hazel which has a distribution right across Europe and western Asia, except for the far north and some islands.  The English names for the species include hazel, hazelnut and avelline. The first recorded use of the species name was by Pliny the Elder in his Naturalis Historia, from Avella, a town in Italy.  It was later used by Leonhart Fuchs in his De historia stirpium commentarii insignes (1542) in which he uses the name Avellana nux sylvestris (the wild nut of Avella). 

The text from Linnaeus (1753) is as follows:


The male flowers of the hazel are a conspicuous feature of the countryside from late December onwards.  They are borne on long thin catkins; because they bear male flowers only they are termed staminate catkins.  These have a short stalk and then a central rachis to which the individual flowers are attached spirally.  Each flower has a hooded pale creamy-green bract with the stamens underneath.  The bract is pointed in the middle and is fringed with short, pale, curly hairs.  With magnification it can be seen that there are two further structures under the bracts – these are the bracteoles and they are attached to the outer half of the bracts; they are also fringed with curly hairs.  The stamens are attached to the underside of the bract at about the same point as the bracteoles.  The bracts taper to the rachis so it is difficult to decide whether the whole catkin is a raceme (each flower with a stalk) or a spike (each without a stalk).  There are six stamens in the upper part of the bract and two arising from the narrowed part of the bract, nearer its point of attachment to the rachis.  The six upper stamens form three pairs and one or more of these may have their filaments joined near the base.  In all the flowers inspected the basal pair of stamens have their filaments joined.



The number of flowers under each bracts as well as the number of

The female flowers are inside a bud-like structures which are further back on the branches than the male ones.  The bud scales towards the base are green and fringed with pale hairs.  The length of the fringe hairs is longer on the scales further inside and these also have an increasing amount of silvery hair on their outer surface.  From the tip of the bud there are a number of stigmas.  Early on these are bright red and then they fade to a purple-brown.  On the ones I inspected there were 18-20 stigmas.  Hayward (1987) in his New Key to Wild Flowers, page 138 wrongly states “the female flowers look like tiny buds with 2 red styles”


  
If the outer scales are removed, a central section is isolated, consisting of narrow hairy bracts and the stigmas.  If prised apart and carefully examined the stigmas are in pairs and each bract has two pairs of stigmas associated with it and a pair of smaller unequally-sized bracteoles.  It is very difficult to see this as the flowers are so closely associated.  If the bracteoles have dried a bit, some can be seen as having an uneven outline as two triangular lobes.  At the base of the stigmas is a small ovary which is divided into two ovules.  Each flower therefore has four stigmas (two per ovule) and thus the whole structure contains five flowers (= 20 stigmas).  There is no clear distinction between stigma and style.  The surface of the style is minutely papillose (uneven with microscopic rounded bumps).  The Flora of China (1999) volume 4 interprets the structures as each ovule having a single style which is divided to the base.

The Flora Europaea makes reference to a small irregularly-lobed perianth in addition to the bracts and bracteoles as does Stace (2011) but I could see no further structures apart from the silky hairs on top of the ovary.